Nothing Changes?

This piece was published as ‘The Bones are Bare’ on Australian Ageing Agenda

I have been back working in the aged care sector for almost twelve months now – first on an interim basis with Baptistcare here in Perth, and for the past four months or so as Chief Executive with Braemar Presbyterian Care in WA.

One of the most common questions on my return to the sector is about the amount of change there has been in “aged care” since I left the sector back at the end of 2010.

One could say that the change has been enormous, with refundable accommodation deposits now part of residential aged care, and significant changes having been made to funding around client centred care in the community aged care sector.

On the other hand, one could quite calmly suggest that no great change has happened. After all, since I first entered the aged care sector back in 1982, we have had at least some fifteen (perhaps closer to twenty) Australian Government Ministers with responsibility for aged care services over the past thirty years. In that same period, we have had at least three major changes to the funding regimes that providers live with daily.

There have been several major reviews of aged care in Australia by either eminent consultants or the Productivity Commission. Reduction of recurrent funding seems to be getting more desperate. What’s new?

There is no doubt that the major change to aged care in Australia by the then Howard Government announced in August 1996 and implemented some fourteen months later as the Aged Care Act was a momentous shift in aged care policy and service delivery in this nation.

That legislation has paved a way for better regulatory provisions around both built form facilities and daily service delivery, with both components now strongly regulated under their respective compliance aspects.

The Australian Aged Care Quality Agency (“AAQCA”) is responsible for the service accreditation delivered by approved residential aged care providers. The quality system itself is unique to Australia, and does not equate to any international standards of quality assurance.

Could it simply be construed as covering the monitoring requirements of the arm of executive government and the bureaucrats who make departmental decisions about what is best for older Australians?

The accreditation system is not cheap with an application cost of between $3,000 and $22,400 per aged care facility, over a three-year period, and based on the number of places in that facility! Now we have the potential of being charged for an Unannounced Visit (read “Spot Check”) per facility per-annum.

You read it correctly.

Not only do we pay for the accreditation process, we also will soon pay for the AAQCA to do one of their mandated Unannounced Visits to the tune of between $2,700 to $5,880 – per facility, per annum, depending on the facility size, effectively adding, as I read the discussion document, between 50{325a31833073d9460f7a78bcb516ce0c388f4161360d4b20624508c43d55a27c} to 90{325a31833073d9460f7a78bcb516ce0c388f4161360d4b20624508c43d55a27c} of the accreditation cost to providers.

This change is to cover the cost of the AAQCA – not the cost of care! The bones are bare. This is a cost too high to be afforded by the providers of our aged care services for an industry specific quality assurance system.

Let me know what you think in the comments below.

3 Replies to “Nothing Changes?”

  1. Hi Wayne,
    The cost of demonstrating quality is high, but the cost of ensuring quality every day is even higher.

    Consumers need some way of making informed choices when selecting a ‘home’ but I am not convinced that the AAQCA system provides the simple ‘comparison’ metrics that consumers and their families are looking for.

    This quality system is a mechanism for Govt to demonstrate it is monitoring its ‘investment’ in care and reassuring the community and individual residents of the ‘policing’ of quality.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *